Servant Leadership - Viterbo University Faculty
Servant Leadership - Viterbo University Faculty
Servant-Leadership - Viterbo University Faculty

 

Wednesday, March 28, 2007

Primary Purpose.

Linda Chezem, who was a trustee at the Greenleaf Center for Servant-Leadership, wrote an article “Leadership that is Quietly Changing the World: Exploration of the Roots of Two Movements.” The article compares the leadership principles of Robert Greenleaf with the two founders of Alcoholics Anonymous (AA) Bill W. and Dr. Bob. Chezem writes that AA’s “Twelve Traditions are leadership lessons in how groups can function.” She also points out that “these gentlemen developed, not simultaneously, and from different experiences and resources, the same premise that leadership comes from within the individual and from within the group to enable the group to function for the common welfare of the members of the group or community.” She closes her article with a reminder that “Because both servant leadership and A.A. are premised on a sense of spirituality, the work of servant leadership can benefit by the research into the effects of the spiritual aspects of A.A.

With that reminder, I would like to continue delving into the spiritual aspects of AA’s Twelve Traditions and their relationship to servant leadership with:

Tradition Six: A group ought never endorse, finance, or lend the group name to any related facility or outside enterprise, lest problems of money, property, and prestige divert us from our primary purpose.

In the publication The Twelve Steps and Twelve Traditions , the authors share the story about how in the early days of AA, a member approached AA’s General Office with question on the possibility of accepting a job as a spokesperson for a group of alcohol distillers. This organization was interested in educating the public that “liquor should be enjoyed, not misused; hard drinkers ought to slow down, and problem drinkers-alcoholics-should not drink at all.” Who better to spread this message than an official member of Alcoholics Anonymous? At first glance, this did not seem like such a bad idea. (Think of the potential earnings that an advertising contract with the liquor industry could bring in.) As the details of the proposal became clear, it was obvious that affiliating the members of Alcoholics Anonymous with the liquor industry was not a good idea and would result in much controversy among the members. Through this and other experiences, the founders of AA realized the importance of not affiliating their organization with any other outside organization, no matter how good or similar a cause the other group might represent. AA existed for one reason and one reason only and that was to help drunks get and stay sober.

Controversy or not, affiliation with groups who have other interests can only lead to distraction from the primary purpose of the group. In his essay "The Institution as Servant", Robert Greenleaf points out the importance of staying focused on the primary purpose where he wrote, “Defining the institution and stating its goals and purposes is probably the most critical task that confronts trustees. Everything else the trustees do rest on this one basic decision.” The Twelve Traditions are great examples of one institution’s attempts at defining goals and purposes, and the Sixth Tradition is an important requirement to ensure that that focus is maintained.

So how do we keep our groups from being diverted from their primary purpose?

 

Tuesday, March 27, 2007

A Pair of Resources on Servant Leadership.

I came across a couple of excellent resources on the web for leadership sites with a servant twist.

A recent comment from reader Chris led me to the Regent University’s School of Leadership Studies Servant Leadership Research Roundtable Proceedings page. Reagent’s School of Leadership hosts an annual conference on servant leadership and has the papers from the 2003 to 2006 presentations available online. I have read a couple and there a many more that look worth reading.

A second reference that I came across is the weLead (Web Enhanced Leadership Education and Development) site. According to the site “weLEAD is an organization developed by leaders, to promote positive leadership development in individuals, organizations and businesses.” The heart of their site is the online magazine appropriately titled “weLEAD”, which is definitely worth a read. They have archives for all their magazines available as PDF files all the way back to its inception in 2001.

So if you are looking for an excuse to spend an evening or two reading about leadership on the web, I would encourage you to check out the Regeant’s Servant Leadership Roundtable and weLead.

 

Monday, March 19, 2007

Healing By Helping Others.

In his essay “The Servant as Leader” Robert Greenleaf included a section, called “Healing and Serving.” He writes about a conference attended by twelve ministers and theologians and twelve psychiatrists. These folks who were all involved in the ministry of healing were asked “why are we in this business?” Their unanimous answer was “for our own healing.” This concept of helping others to heal in order to heal ourselves is in essence what the Fifth Tradition is all about.

Tradition Five – Each group has but one purpose: to help others affected by dis-ease to heal.

This is the tradition that reminds us that neglecting those who still suffer is a threat to our own sanity, and that the essence of all healing is love. Love of not only others, but also ourselves. Love is about respect, tolerance, and acceptance of our ourselves and those who may have wronged us. Acceptance of self assumes the responsiblity of caring for self. Carrying the message of healing to others (who are receptive to hearing it) allows us to hear the message ourselves as we see it reflected in others. The book “How Alanon Works” concludes the discussion of the Fifth Tradition with this reminder, “When any one of us is healed, we all heal a little.”

So how do we work on healing ourselves and others?

 

Wednesday, March 14, 2007

Servant-Leaders Training Academy

Here’s an upcoming Servant-Leader course that looks interesting.

From the Servant-Leader Training Academy.

Join us in Minneapolis on April 26 & 27, 2007

For people who are naturally inclined to lead by serving first, the Servant-Leader Training Academy is a professional development program sponsored by the Hendrickson Institute for Ethical Leadership of Saint Mary’s University of Minnesota, and Lurie Besikof Lapidus & Company, LLP.

Constructed on a life-enriching philosophy and leadership best practices, this program will provide a valuable set of tools designed to bring out the finest performance in you and others.
In this comprehensive, skills-oriented course the world-class faculty integrates
Robert Greenleaf’s foundational concept of leading by serving first, with the latest
thinking of top researchers (e.g., W. Bennis, J. Collins, J. Kouzes, P. Senge) and
translates it all into behaviors that can be applied today.

• World-Class Faculty
• Practical, Skills Oriented
• Integrates a Wealth of Leadership Research
• Perfect Fit for Leaders of 21st Century Organizations

Minneapolis, Minnesota Location.
Space is Limited. $1,450 Program Fee.
Register by Friday, April 20, 2007.

Click here for more information.

 

Tuesday, March 13, 2007

Autonomy.

Robert Greenleaf concluded his essay “Servant Leadership in Churches” with some thoughts on the power that autonomous people have in our organizations.

While I would like to see more non-servants converted to servanthood, my greater hope is that more of those who are natural servants, who get joy out of serving, will become aggressive builders of serving institutions. Within these institutions the opportunity may seem larger for those in higher status positions, but as more and more people, regardless of their status, are asserting their autonomy and articulating their beliefs, literally everyone who is inside and who has some force as a person can be an institution builder.
It is this ability to be self-governing, to be autonomous that is the topic of the next Tradition I would like to write about.

Tradition Four: Each group should be autonomous except in matters affecting other groups or the organization as a whole.

For individuals to achieve autonomy, the groups to which they belong must also be autonomous. Real change in organizations occurs because of the autonomy that is the source of creativity. Restrictions, rules, dictations, and governance from outside the organization restrict this creativity. As Greenleaf indicated, this autonomy empowers the individuals that make up a group to speak their mind and participate in the creative process. This is the tradition that grants freedom of choice to the groups to meet their own needs.

This tradition also links back to the first tradition in that the only time group autonomy is overruled is when the common welfare that guides the organization is threatened. There needs to be clarity about why the group has come together and what it is the group hopes to accomplish.

So how do we encourage autonomy in our organizations?

 

Wednesday, March 07, 2007

A Desire to Heal.

The Twelve Traditions are a set of guidelines originally developed to keep the Alcoholics Anonymous groups healthy, and were later slightly modified and picked up by other Twelve Steps groups. The Twelve Steps were suggested tools to help keep the individuals healthy. Robert Greenleaf once proposed creating an organization, he suggested calling “Seekers Anonymous,” whose goal would be to help members to heal from the structural flaws of society. This the third part of a series on some possible guidlines for such an organization based on principles from Alcoholics Anonymous and its sister organization Alanon's Twelve Traditions.

Tradition Three: The only requirement for membership is a desire to heal.

What this means is that only an individual member has the authority to decide if that individual will belong to the group. If the individual wants to belong, they belong. Noone can keep them out. There are no credentials, gender limitations, income limitations, ethnicity restrictions, religious preferences, or any other restrictions. No applications are filled out, no dues are paid, no membership lists are kept, no rules restrict membership, and no attendance is taken. There are no judges of who should or should not belong.
There are no punishments for non-compliance. Attendance is equivalent to membership.

 

Thursday, March 01, 2007

Our Leaders Are But Trusted Servants.

Continuing with a series of posts on my take on the Twelve Traditions of various Twelve Step Groups and how they relate to servant leadership I present -

Tradition Two. “For our group purpose there is but one ultimate authority-a loving God as He may express Himself in our group conscience. Our leaders are but trusted servants; they do not govern.”

This is the tradition where servant leadership is easiest to see; this tradition could simply say “We practice servant leadership.”

What makes this Tradition different from many other groups that focus on being led by a higher power is the freedom that Twelve Step groups offer their members in defining their own higher power, and the freedom individuals have to express what it is they hear their higher power calling them to be. What is important is not how you define this higher power, but simply that you acknowledge It. The terminology of the tradition may not make this clear as it reflects the Christian heritage of the drafters at the time the traditions were written (AA’s publication The Twelve Steps and Twelve Traditions, was first published in 1953).

The spirituality of the group as expressed through the individual members is the group conscious. All members are equal, junior members and senior members bring equal value to the group; all are capable of expressing wisdom to inspire. Leadership roles are rotated throughout the membership. The primary role of leadership is to carry out the group conscience, not to dictate it. There is no dictator; there is cooperation.

Some thoughts on The Second Tradition.